Skip to content

NAACP Supports Michael Vick's return to the NFL

Off Topic

Suggested Topics

  • Can't believe it's not a basenji

    Off Topic
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    20k Views
    G
    Sounds like that dog needs a nail trim. (long nails are my pet peeve… that sound on my floor would make me nuts} -Joanne
  • Where's AJ #21

    Off Topic
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    AJs HumanA
    Wags Podengo=Fats Domino. :) Thank you for playing….. :D
  • Birthday's

    Off Topic
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    L
    I don't know of any Rita Jean. Mine was born Christmas Day which makes it easy to remember.
  • Where's AJ #13

    Off Topic
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    AJs HumanA
    Aha!…But I didn't say largest living animals…I was speaking of the Great Grandfathers of Northern California, the Giant Sequoia commonly known as Redwoods. :D
  • The Roommate's Pup

    Off Topic
    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    6k Views
    tanzaT
    Me too….. and at least you can take the pro-active way.. and protect your "kids".... Kudos
  • Michael Vick Article

    Off Topic
    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    4k Views
    lvossL
    I find it disturbing that the author has such little value for life and would write an article defending abuse. No living thing should be beaten and tortured and a person who values life so little that they would do so does represent a possible harm to humans. A person who is willing to justify such behavior because "it was only property" is also scary. His comparison to deer hunting is highly flawed since it is not the hunter's intent to cause pain and torture, they strive for a clean kill and the purpose is to increase the health of the population by decreasing numbers to what the land can support since there are no longer enough natural predators to do the job. People who torture and abuse wildlife are just as wrong as those who do it to domesticated animals. The absolute worst thing about this article though is that the editor of the paper thought that it was an appropriate "sports" article. That is the section of the paper that it was published in.