• @lvoss:

    My vet likes my dogs. They are well socialized, easy to examine, and generally well behaved. My trainers like my dogs for mostly the same the reasons though part of why we go to class is to maintain the socialization and good behavior. I do not kennel my dogs, I have a house sitter and she also likes my dogs and comments on the same characteristics.

    I have encountered people who have had bad experiences with the breed but I do not think it is the norm. Breeders have worked very hard to breed good temperaments. Responsible breeders also do alot of early socialization to give a good foundation to their puppies when they go to their new homes.

    My Vet(s) and all the tech like my dogs… well except if they are there for a procedure that requires IV dip.... Kristii and Mickii "remove" them regardless of how they try to stop them... 😃 They usually have to have a tech sit with them the entire time... 😉 I don't kennel mine either, I am lucky to have a house sitter that loves all Basenjis...


  • My vet and staff all love my B's also. They've never so much as wiggled on the table, and always greet everyone who enters the room.


  • Our tri male is great until the nail trimming, taking blood, getting shots, no problem, examining him is also no problem. It's always the nail trimming he hates. He's always hated it.

    Our female on the other hand is a scaredy dog so EVERYTHING the vet does is full of drama. She struggles on the table, she never bites, but you have to wrestle her still. One time while getting a vacination shot she actually broke my wife's nose in two places by jerking her head around. She was still till the shot, then WHAM! Now my wife wont take them to the vet anymore, I have to.

    On time while nail trimming, which our female also hates (she wont bite) actually freaked out so bad, that poop shot out of her bottom!


  • Getting a group to sit for a picture like that is no easy task, impressive.

    Great looking B's, it is a very cool picture and setting.


  • Getting any basenji to sit still that is not sleeping is a task!


  • @Barklessdog:

    I got that picture from the Basenji Picture site I had in my Basenji Web Site Thread. A lot a really professional photo's there.

    That is a problem with posting pictures on line, anyone can copy them. If you post a picture you have to accept a million people could be copying or using your picture.

    True, of course you could have posted that it was not your picture….


  • True -= fixed


  • @Barklessdog:

    I got that picture from the Basenji Picture site I had in my Basenji Web Site Thread. A lot a really professional photo's there.

    That is a problem with posting pictures on line, anyone can copy them. If you post a picture you have to accept a million people could be copying or using your picture.

    Actually, though anyone could copy it, it does not make it any less a violation of copyright. If someone uses someone else's picture there are ways to correctly cite a source.


  • Is everything published on the Internet {or in print, for that matter} protected by copyright laws? Or isn't there a need for an actual copyright?

    NOT in any way saying that sources shouldn't be cited, due credit given.
    Simply asking the question because I don't know the answer.


  • @JazzysMom:

    Is everything published on the Internet {or in print, for that matter} protected by copyright laws? Or isn't there a need for an actual copyright?

    NOT in any way saying that sources shouldn't be cited, due credit given.
    Simply asking the question because I don't know the answer.

    Everything published in a tangible form such as the internet is protected by copyright laws. As soon as it is put into tangible form it is copyright protected. I teach high school and spend a lot of time instructing on copyright and plagarism even though I am science teacher not an English teacher.

    Here is a great website about copyright, http://www.whatiscopyright.org/


  • @tanza:

    True, of course you could have posted that it was not your picture….

    barklessdog did post that it wasn't her pic, in a response to me. I thought WOW…Chicago looks like that..barklessdog said "no its not my pic" It is a great pic! I guess I'm an idiot for thinking Chicago had a wilderness like that one.


  • Saying "Not My Picture" is not adequately citing the source of copyrighted material.


  • @lvoss:

    Everything published in a tangible form such as the internet is protected by copyright laws. As soon as it is put into tangible form it is copyright protected.
    Here is a great website about copyright, http://www.whatiscopyright.org/

    Thanks. I thought things actually had to have a "copyright" date of some sort.


  • gently directing this back to the topic again 🙂

    Here's a pic of one of Taariq's paws (photoshopped). You can clearly see they're cloven, and all four paws look like that.


  • The paw looks like a deer hoof.


  • :eek: drinking my coffee now


  • I think it would be unfortunate that we may miss out on photo's or quotes or whatever since they are on someone's web site. I didn't take it that Barklessdog was trying to "pass off" a picture of his/her own, just found one and wanted to share.

    If I wanted to know where he/she got it I would just ask. I assume if you put something online you want people to see it. I will admit pics I have seen here I have sent to my boyfriend and said, YOu have got to see this one, what a gorgeous dog! or whatever. I would have never thought someone would get upset about it. We are all here because we love this dog- yours and everyone elses. He/She was not trying to make money off of it.

    Barklessdog, I apologize for saying he/she. I didn't want to assume anything.


  • No apologies needed. I'm the one who's apologizing.

    I'm not really upset, but never thought about it.


  • @Barklessdog:

    But I guess this does make everyone aware that posting any picture on the Internet is really offering it to the WORLD. You have to except that someone in China or Texas is copying all your pictures, using them how they like.

    What I think it really does is make everyone who "borrows" material from the internet aware that the owners of those website are NOT making it available to the WORLD and that if the owner of the copyrighted material finds out they can demand it be removed and take legal action to seek damages. Putting it on a website does not make it free to the public and does not make it legal for people to use it without permission even if people do it. Just like just because someone thinks they can shoplift and not get caught does not make it legal.

    I am not saying people should not share pictures they find that they think might be topical but why not direct people to the website where they are posted or at least cite your source? Is that really that hard?


  • Can anyone find or show their dog that has the same paws?

Suggested Topics