@eeeefarm said in NEW BRAND of DOG FOOD??:
Dogs historically were fed leftovers from the table, and before that whatever they could scavenge around a human's camp. Probably still eat that way in villages in Africa. Feed companies have implied that you need a degree in nutrition to nourish a dog properly. Funny, children don't get that much consideration! Junk food would seem to suffice for them....
My child got that much consideration... for the record. Looking at the US obesity rate in children and huge increase in diabetes, we need to pay a lot more attention.
As for dogs eating scavenged food, sure they did, and were malnourished and died young. What makes me insane is the idea that raw is bad, when it takes thousands of years to change a mammal on a molecular basis and they sure ate mostly raw until the last 200 yrs. As for needing a degree... have known many people trying to make their own dog food and ended up with very sick dogs. I don't think it takes a degree, but some basic knowledge and common sense. Someone suggested using Real Meat Co. I nearly had a stroke... about $100 for 5 pounds of food? Are they INSANE? And the "OH MY G-D YOU FEED YOUR DOG TABLE SCRAPS?" Get real. My dogs always get some of everything I eat that isn't toxic or too yummy (lobster for example ) . I read a vet article once and he said not only is it okay to give them a few bites of whatever you are eating, but considering their taste ability far exceeds ours, it enriches their lives. That might be a little much, but I basically agree. Variety. Dogs that can ONLY eat one food without getting sick are created by people who only ever give them one food. Yeah rambling... sorry.