I know a university professor who was charged and convicted using the same excuses. And his was with legit STUDENTS. They said he could show the film, he could NOT give illegal copies. But that was about 20 yrs ago, laws change. The Supreme Court has many copyright reviews, and it is discussed by experts, so do you really think what you have or don't have matters. But I can assure you that since this is NOT an educational venue, that such a back-peddled explanation wouldn't hold water, it doesn't really matter. Bottom line, you don't own the rights and offered to share. If that doesn't bother you, oh well. I
Btw, I don't know any basenji owners who haven't seen or even bought the movie.
But here is the thing… life in general will be easier for you if you stop taking any disagreement to such extremes. I simply state the dangers and my views on crates. Instead of "I disagree" and move on, you have turned it into a soap opera with many hundreds of words about your expertise, ties, now law degree, whatever. That really is on you. No need. The topic is crate training. Nothing you say will convince me not trying to teach nonstressful crate training is good. I have no control over you so why you cannot just take that as my opinion and move on, I don't know.
So let me try to stem more long tirades.
I don't care about your experiences, degrees, who you hang out with, anything. With the discussion of ideas, try to stick to the ideas. This is the internet, no one cares enough to check out your claims and they don't matter. It is a glorious thing that facts/ideas/discussions hinge on the TOPIC, not the person. Please try it.
You want to debate crate training and why NOT crate training is better, go ahead. Stay on topic. Stop making it more than it is. Or... say you don't care about my view and move on. No need for all this drama. Really. Or simply put me on ignore so you don't see my posts. ![:) 🙂](https://basenjiforums.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/emoji-one/1f642.png?v=dd0ek6p7usa)