All pups have been placed as responsible breeders have reservation lists. We are not at this time planning a litter for 2020 or 2021. I would be happy to talk to you about Basenjis. You can search for responsible breeders at www.basenji.org by state, however as far as I know all responsible breeders on the West Coast already have full reservation lists. You would be looking at litters possible in 2021. This is the time to connect with a responsible breeder and get on their reservation lists for 2021. And if you are looking for a dog that is hypoallergenic, Basenjis do shed and have dander so they are not really hypoallergenic. While they can do well with people with allergies, you need to spend time with them and more than one time. Be sure that you check out health testing yourself, regardless of what you might be advised. Tests for DNA testing is public knowledge at www.ofa.org. You need to have either a registration number or name to check this out for yourself to verify. I suggest all people looking for a Basenji, even my own, do this.
Wanted: Male Basenji :)
-
Do let us know how it goes..
-
Unless you plan on breeding, a Fanconi test result of 'carrier' shouldn't be a problem.
-
Hi Kipawa! Our last B had Fanconi, and my husband was very animate about getting a B without Fanconi, if we were to bring a B into our lives again. We don't plan on breeding, and if people are breeding the gene 'out' of the breed, it's just our preference to have a B that won't have this gene.
-
Okay but again, if the dog is only a carrier, and we now have a gene test, not just marker, the chances are slim to near zero the dog would develop Fanconi.
That said, I do understand and if you husband feels better with a clear dog, you should be able to find one! Sadly, the biggest issue with me and BRAT is not only that they won't test, but they won't let a potential home pay for testing prior to getting a dog. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
-
BRAT is not only that they won't test, but they won't let a potential home pay for testing prior to getting a dog.:(
Gee… I knew THEY wouldn't test, but didn't realize they won't let a potential home pay for a test. What are they concerned about? Confidentiality? They could ask the potential home people to sign a document stating they will not divulge the results of the test, and that the test results not be included in Sally's database.
If this is what it takes to get a dog to a new home, you would think everyone would do their best for the individual dog? I see it worse if a BRAT dog gets a new home, the owners test, and then find out the dog has tested affected. If that happened to me I would be p*ssed off, though I would keep the dog. I know others wouldn't, and can appreciate why they wouldn't.
-
Their position has been stated several times on the subject of testing. They do not want the dog's status known because if the dog tests as Affected it would adversely effect their ability to adopt the dog out. They feel that once the adopters have the dog in their possession they will be more likely to tough it out if they find out the dog's status.
-
If I remember correctly, when we only had the linkage test BRAT also used that was a reason not to test, because it was just a linkage test. However, now that there is a direct test, I would think it is really going to be hard to hold that position.
-
However, now that there is a direct test, I would think it is really going to be hard to hold that position.
Agreed. Honesty should apply.
-
I think Brat walks on water in many ways. And I get that financially they don't have an extra (say 240 dogs x 65) $17,000 for testing. But I do wish people would get together to fund raise JUST for Fanconi testing. And I absolutely lose it over the "won't let test" issue.
Anyway, sorry, didn't mean to hijack this. -
I think that many adopters would pay for the cost. And add to that if it is a situation that a person has contacted BRAT to give up the dog and he/she is not tested then they should be required to put up that fee.
I think that BRAT does an excellent job in most respects, however this is one point that I really disagree with not testing. I am not sure that they would agree to test even if people covered the cost
