Skip to content

Anyone know about microchipping/tattooing?

Breeder Talk
  • @Shaye's:

    Shaye is chipped with Home Again - the previous owner had chipped Gemma with 24PetWatch. I was not able to upload a picture of Gemma to 24PetWatch, and I never hear from them except when a yearly charge is due. I get e-mails all the time from HomeAgain, if there is a lost pet in my area - I was also able to upload a picture of Shaye. One thing I really like about Homeagain is that there is a downloadable poster with the pet's picture and all the information, plus those little tabs at the bottom people can tear off to call you if they find the pet. My vet automatically checks the chip each year when they go in for their checkup and shots, to be sure it has not moved. This should be part of a yearly checkup, IMO.

    Thank you for this. I was leaning towards chips, but i wasnt really sure. I didnt know much about them, but the tattooing i knew NOTHING about, so the chips were better. but now i am sure ill stick with the microchips and use the incentive program to my advantage. :) Thank you for the help

  • @misspodhradsky:

    Um they have an incentive program type of thing. For each microchip you buy, you get 1 point. If you get 25 points, you get a free box of 25 per microchip]

    Can I just confirm with everyone here that one chip is all you should need for an individual dog's life?

  • @Kipawa:

    Can I just confirm with everyone here that one chip is all you should need for an individual dog's life?

    Yes I know that, i hope other people know that, but i just meant if you breed or rescue (you have alot of dogs and puppies) then the incentive program is nice because after 25 chips purchased, you never have to buy another one as long as your people enroll their dogs, and once you sell 25 puppies, you will get 25 more points to get for free ("buy") another box of 25 microchips so ultimately for the initial price (whichever program u choose (25 ct box, 2 10ct boxes ad a 5ct box, 5-5ct boxes, or go for the long expensive process of purchasing them each) you will then, after the purchase of 25 is made, you will never have to buy another one again. So for rescues that initial cost is great because its alot but after that is all free as long as you get the person to enroll their new pet (for $19.95 each pet, or 17.50 online.) You just have to make sure they include the incentive promotional code. mine is XXX5585. So just tell the new owners to type that in the online box. Otherwise i have forms with the number already on my paper that they send in. Its very nice. But not for just a pet owner, you have to be a rescuer or a breeder or it does you no good, as you will never need to get 25 microchips (unless you buy 25 dogs) lol

    Anyways hope i didnt confuse anyone. Summary: Yes one chip per one dog for the lifetime of the dog, but if you breed or rescue, the incentive program is the way to go :)

  • It really depends on the breeder. It would take me well over 5 years before I could ever claim my "free box" of microchips. Even counting my co-bred litters in 6 years time, I have only bred 16 puppies.

  • @lvoss:

    It really depends on the breeder. It would take me well over 5 years before I could ever claim my "free box" of microchips. Even counting my co-bred litters in 6 years time, I have only bred 16 puppies.

    you know what, I really enjoyed reading that. :) Im glad you didnt breed alot of dogs just to have puppies. 16 puppies is a good amount of puppies in 6 years. :) Very responsible. but ya they are never ending, the points never expire. so even if you take 20 years, they are still good. so i still think its a good deal, no matter how many puppies you may have (or rescue)

  • I have only whelped 8 puppies in 3 litters over 6 years and am co-breeder on 2 more litters totaling another 8 puppies. I am just saying it really isn't much of a deal if I have to pay $250 up front for something that I am not even going to use in 5 year time. Especially since you must be sure that they can be stored so that they maintain their sterility. For breeders who have more puppies this may be a reasonable deal but for many who only have an occasional litter it is probably not as appealing.

  • @Kipawa:

    Can I just confirm with everyone here that one chip is all you should need for an individual dog's life?

    It should be, but chips have been know to migrate and can't be found… Or I have even wondered if when they are planned, if too close to the needle site, don't pop out.

    lvoss had Sophie (I co-own Sophie with Lisa) chipped as a baby puppy but when it came time to get her hips/elbows done for OFA, they could not find that chip anyplace on her, so she had to be re-chipped that day.

    And always good to have the chip checked once in a while

  • At the shelter, one of the deputies told me she has seen some people when chipping actually push the needle in one side and out the other so the chip never even ended up in the dog.

    The vet who did Sophie's hips for OFA said that because the chips are so big they can sometimes migrate right back out the tract they went in within the first couple of hours. My mom has two that the chips were placed a bit off to the side and migrated down their shoulders. I also have a friend whose dog has one chip that just doesn't give a signal so needed a second chip.

    It is a good idea to have the chip checked during vet visits.

  • Knowing how fast technology changes and improves, I'd be hesitant to sign up for a program like this if I weren't going to be using it in a couple of years or less.

    Remember VCRs? Cassette tapes? Telephones that attach to walls? :D

  • @listeme:

    Knowing how fast technology changes and improves, I'd be hesitant to sign up for a program like this if I weren't going to be using it in a couple of years or less.

    Remember VCRs? Cassette tapes? Telephones that attach to walls? :D

    lol. ya i suppose you all are right. At first i thought about it, but i dont know. I guess its still a good thing if you have to do more than one chip in a dog. and i think they said the microchips are good forever (whether thats possible or not) I guess its still worth it for me, IMO. Since rescue and my personal dogs. I can use that amount of chips (in rescue) within a year or two. So…i think its a good deal. Whether it is or not...

Suggested Topics

  • Does anyone know this breeder?

    Breeder Talk
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    misspodhradskyM
    I have not heard about her. Sorry. Maybe contact some UK breeders.
  • You know you have a good breeder when..

    Breeder Talk
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    nomrbddgsN
    He's so cute-that's my boy!
  • Anyone Know these People?

    Breeder Talk
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    YodelDogsY
    There is no documented cases of blue or cream Basenjis having alopecia. That said, while these people do DNA test for Fanconi now they do no other health testing and the exact lineage of their dogs cannot be traced. These people are not bad people per se but they are not very knowledgable about the breed. They do breed multiple breeds solely for profit.
  • Anyone heard of this breeder?

    Breeder Talk
    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    11k Views
    misspodhradskyM
    AWW MAN! lol i wish I could have a basenji play date! lol Anyone know of anyone in Mitchell, SD? Would love to have a Basenji play date with anyone living here, or even passing through with their B's. :)
  • In-Breeding/Line Breeding

    Breeder Talk
    18
    0 Votes
    18 Posts
    7k Views
    tanzaT
    @Quercus: <> Right...I wasn't sure if that was the litter that Sue was referring to? But I don't know of her doing any other brother/sister breeding. So yes, Ariel is a product of that breeding. The idea was to do a test breeding to see what genetically, if anything, might be brought out. By doing an inbreeding, you can 'expose' recessive genes, and see what you've actually got. You can also set (as in permanantly set) type...but, that wasn't the goal in Sue/Jeff's breeding. In this case, the two "best" "typey" puppies from this litter will most likely be bred on from, as long as they test out as genetically and physically healthy, they will most likely be out-crossed, to bring in different genes. Ariel's brother, George, is quite stunning, and is easily the best looking puppy in the litter. Ariel has a beautiful head, but is long in body, short in leg. Neither one is what we consider a "show dog" ;) And the litter's sire is quite handsome!.... the dam of the litter, while long in the back and short on leg (like it sounds Ariel is) has a great temperament... both are great to build on the future.... and breeding out from these pups will be great to build on too.... I am pretty sure that would be the breeding Sue was talking about, like you I don't know of any other brother/sister breeding she and Jeff has done.
  • AKC / ACA Registrations

    Breeder Talk
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    4k Views
    QuercusQ
    One of the main reasons small operation breeders don't use AKC dogs is because a breeder sold them a dog under an AKC limited registration, meaning the dog wasn't intended to be breeding stock, and the breeder intended for the puppy to be neutered when it was old enough. Sometimes people decide they are not going to get the puppy fixed, and will use it for breeding…at that point, any puppies produced from that dog are not registerable with the AKC. But the other registeries will sign those dogs up with no questions asked.