5 Aug 09 Pet Alert - Congress considers pet expenses tax deduction

Basenji Health Issues & Questions
Log in to reply
  • lvossL

    Not necessarily. Were they truly comparable estimates as far as pre-op bloodwork IV during anesthia, etc? Also, you have no way of knowing what each practice's overhead is. One could own the building or have been there so long their rent is very low compared to the other.

    My repro vet has very good rates for her services, this is in large part because her practice is located in an industrial area where the space is cheaper and she has been there quite a while. The drawback is that it is out of the way and takes a significant amount of time to get to. My regular vet is conveniently located in a shopping center with a pharmacist next door and a pet supply store next to that. They also have a working relationship with the specialists from UC Davis who will do in office consults with patients there. The cost is more for my regular vet, rent is high in Davis and there is the cost of keeping up with technology. I don't think that they are gouging me but the difference in operating costs means a difference in cost to their clients.

    0
  • lvossL

    The vets I have a problem with are the ones that recommend unneccessary procedures. I had a puppy person call me quite upset when their vet told them that their, at the time, 1 year old basenji would need major surgery to remove a small bump from his lip and that his jaw could be permanently damaged from the surgery. The first question I asked is what did the fine needle aspiration of the lump show that required this radical approach. Their response, "Huh? What is a fine needle aspiration?" The vet hadn't even bothered to look at what type of cells were in the lump. They saw a lump and the only option they gave the owner was surgery without even doing any diagnostic work to determine what the lump might be. And the estimate on the surgery was well over $1000. The vet even went so far as to make the owner feel bad when she walked out of the office saying she would have to really think about this before agreeing, telling her that she was jeopardizing her dog's life and it if she waited too long it would be riddled with tumors and dead.

    At my urging, they sought a second opinion and the fine needle aspiration showed a mild infection probably caused by a nip from the 12 week old puppy in the household at the time. Some antibiotics and time and the bump went away on its own and has never recurred. And the total cost was around $100-$150.

    0
  • nobarkusN

    @lvoss:

    Not necessarily. Were they truly comparable estimates as far as pre-op bloodwork IV during anesthia, etc? Also, you have no way of knowing what each practice's overhead is. One could own the building or have been there so long their rent is very low compared to the other.

    My repro vet has very good rates for her services, this is in large part because her practice is located in an industrial area where the space is cheaper and she has been there quite a while. The drawback is that it is out of the way and takes a significant amount of time to get to. My regular vet is conveniently located in a shopping center with a pharmacist next door and a pet supply store next to that. They also have a working relationship with the specialists from UC Davis who will do in office consults with patients there. The cost is more for my regular vet, rent is high in Davis and there is the cost of keeping up with technology. I don't think that they are gouging me but the difference in operating costs means a difference in cost to their clients.

    Both vets have been in town for about 30 years. They are about 1 mile apart in town. I have been going to the first vet since 1983 and since the late 90's their fees have been climbing fast. They have been in the same building that they own for over 30 years. I have seen posts from other people saying they are 50% higher than other vets. Anyway I don't want to get off the subject here which is tax write-offs.

    Buddy, Paolo and Dan

    0
  • BARTB

    @GenJMar:

    Would love for this to bill to pass. I don't have human children and alway feel I get the shaft when filing taxes.

    Ditto. While I haven't had and vet bills in the $1000 range (knock wood-knock,knock) and for the most part my guys have been healthy, it does seem that the price of the check-ups just keeps inching up and up. When it come to the tax code, if we could take even a percentage of it as a deduction it would be nice. I have a co-worker who's mutt was having surgery to have an eye removed just yesterday (Friday) and I know she has spent several thousand dollars trying to save the eye before it got to this point.
    I agree the chances of something like this ever even getting out of committee are somewhere between slim and none, but we can dream, can't we:)

    0
  • BARTB

    BTW, just did a google search for "H.R. 3501". Came up with 2 very different bills. One the "pet" bill and the other had something to do with "securities and commodities". What up!!! Am I wrong in assuming (don't say it) that H.R. means House of Representatives and not the Senate. If I'm not, then why 2 very different bills?? Something is amiss…...but still dreaming! :)

    0
  • MaxieM

    How will we know when the Pet Expenses Tax Deductions bill will be voted on
    or has it already been passed or defeated?

    0
  • QuercusQ

    @tanza:

    No, I operate as a hobby….. not a non-profit. Done as an individual (I only speak for myself)

    But, Pat…don't you have to declare the income? I mean, selling puppies, even if you are not breaking even, is still income...and it is well over the small amount allowed to be untaxed.

    But I agree...I would MUCH prefer to take vet care expense deduction than count it as a business expense. The IRS isn't very clear in hobby vs income area, and if you get audited you could be get an auditor that has a totally different interpretation than your accountant.

    We don't have to worry about it this year (or last), as we won't be breeding again for a long time. But it would be helpful if it was more clear...

    Andrea Walters

    Quercus Basenjis

    NW Ohio

    0
  • QuercusQ

    @Kananga:

    Right, but my point was that you're essentially operating as a non-profit since you're not paying any taxes on income and you're not showing a profit (with a motivation not to). Losses from such should not flow through to personal income. It's similar how gambling to some is a hobby. The losses do not offset your income (no deduction). But at times you make money, but it's usually offset by a loss.

    Pet expenses are different according to this proposed change. It's a decent idea, however, I have my doubts that something like this would go through. Especially with the running deficit. This would have a big impact on personal income tax revenue as there are a good number of pet owners in the US.

    It would be nice but I wouldn't have high hopes for it.

    I agree Kananga…it sounds like a pipe dream. For one thing....seems like there would need to be some sort of official record of the pets one owns..otherwise you could collect receipts from other people and deduct expenses that you didn't actually pay....

    Andrea Walters

    Quercus Basenjis

    NW Ohio

    0
  • V

    I'll be praying for that bill to pass.
    Six dogs = BIG vet bills.

    0
  • K

    yes we have one of these! :D

    0

Suggested Topics

  • Kris_ChristineK

    NEW ORLEANS- Action Alert

    Basenji Health Issues & Questions
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    Kris_ChristineK
    NEW ORLEANS 3/7/13 City Council Passes Ordinance to Reduce Rabies Vaccinations from Annually to Once Every 3 Years http://nolacitycouncil.com/content/display.asp?id=54&nid=%7B8172B5EB-B475-47B9-B1D0-812EAD34FDFE%7D
  • Kris_ChristineK

    Small Dog Vaccination Danger Alert

    Basenji Health Issues & Questions
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    Kris_ChristineK
    Debra, I'm happy to send you a copy of the report if you e-mail me at ledgespring@lincoln.midcoast.com. Below is information I excerpted from the report: The quotes in red below are from the attached scientific report covering adverse events within 3 days of vaccination in dogs over the course of 2 years. Reports of dogs having vaccinal adverse reactions within the same time frame were not included if heartworm medication had been administered along with the vaccines. This study did not include adverse reactions such as development of fibrosarcomas and/or other conditions which take longer than 3 days to develop. Moore, George E. et als., Adverse events diagnosed within three days of Vaccine Administration in Dogs, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Vol 227, No. 7, October 1, 2005 Animals—1,226,159 dogs vaccinated at 360 veterinary hospitals. Results—4,678 adverse events (38.2/10,000 dogs vaccinated) were associated with administration of 3,439,576 doses of vaccine to 1,226,159 dogs. The VAAE rate decreased significantly as body weight increased. Risk was 27% to 38% greater for neutered versus sexually intact dogs and 35% to 64% greater for dogs approximately 1 to 3 years old versus 2 to 9 months old. The risk of a VAAE significantly increased as the number of vaccine doses administered per office visit increased; each additional vaccine significantly increased risk of an adverse event by 27% in dogs ≤ 10 kg (22 lb) and 12% in dogs > 10 kg. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Young adult small-breed neutered dogs that received multiple vaccines per office visit were at greatest risk of a VAAE within 72 hours after vaccination. Records for dogs that received both an injectable heartworm preventive and a vaccine during the same office visit were not included in analyses. Population—In the 2-year study period, 4,531,837 vaccine doses were administered to 1,537,534 dogs at 360 veterinary hospitals. Among breeds with 5,000 or more dogs vaccinated, Dachshund, Pug, Boston Terrier, Miniature Pinscher, and Chihuahua breeds had the highest rates of VAAEs with 121.7, 93.0, 83.8, 76.4, and 76.1 adverse events/10,000 dogs vaccinated, respectively (Table 1). The VAAE rate for mixed-breed dogs was in the bottom quintile of all rates. The VAAE rates decreased significantly as body weight increased (P for trend < 0.001; Figure 1). For all vaccines or for rabies vaccine alone, the VAAE rate for 10.1- to 45.0-kg (22.2- to 99.0-lb) dogs was approximately half the rate for dogs that weighed 0 to 10.0 kg (0 to 22.0 lb; P < 0.001; Figure 2). For rabies vaccine administered alone, VAAE rates/10,000 dogs that weighed 0 to 10.0 kg, 10.1 to 45.0 kg, and > 45 kg were 32.1 (222/69,178), 15.3 (69/45,088), and 0.0 (0/1,966), respectively. The risk of a VAAE significantly increased as the number of vaccines administered per office visit increased (P for trend < 0.001). In all dogs, each additional vaccine administered per office visit increased the rate of a VAAE by 24.2%; the rate increase was significantly (P <0.001) greater in dogs that weighed 0 to 10.0 kg, compared with dogs that weighed 0.1 to 45.0 kg (27.3% vs 11.5%, respectively; Figure 4). The 3 dogs with recorded deaths each had received ≥ 4 vaccines at their last office visit. The lowest rate was observed with parenteral administration of Bordetella vaccine (15.4/10,000; 82 VAAEs/53,238 doses), and the highest rate was observed with Borrelia (Lyme disease) vaccine (43.7/10,000; 132 VAAEs/30,201 doses). The risk of a VAAE in this study population was inversely related to a dog’s weight. Factors known to cause vaccine reactions include the primary vaccine agent or antigen, adjuvants, preservatives, stabilizers, and residues from tissue cultures used in vaccine production. The overall formulation of various vaccine components (eg, antigen, adjuvants, and diluent) is proprietary information that was unavailable for analysis in our study; thus, the variation in VAAE rates among single-antigen vaccines may not be solely attributable to the primary vaccine antigen. … because of genetic heterogeneity, the relatively low VAAE rate observed in mixed-breed dogs suggests that laboratory safety trials that use such dogs may underestimate the VAAE rates that would occur in purebred dogs. This is important because purebred dogs comprise at least two thirds of the US dog population. The risk of allergic reaction has been reported to increase after the third or fourth injection of a vaccine (ie, a booster response). Neutering appeared to increase risk of a VAAE more than sex. Females mount stronger immune responses after vaccination or infection than males because of a dimorphic enhancing effect of estrogens and a protective effect of androgens. Below are links to excellent information on veterinary vaccines from authoritative sources: Duration of Immunity to Canine Vaccines: What We Know and Don't Know, Dr. Ronald Schultz http://www.cedarbayvet.com/duration_of_immunity.htm What Everyone Needs to Know about Canine Vaccines, Dr. Ronald Schultz http://www.puliclub.org/CHF/AKC2007Conf/What%20Everyone%20Needs%20to%20Know%20About%20Canine%20Vaccines.htm Age and Long-term Protective Immunity in Dogs and Cats, Dr. Ronald Schultz et als., Journal of Comparative Pathology January 2010 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WHW-4XVBB71-1&_user=10&_coverDate=01%2F31%2F2010&_rdoc=17&_fmt=high&_orig=browse&_srch=doc-info(%23toc%236861%232010%23998579999.8998%231578454%23FLA%23display%23Volume)&_cdi=6861&_sort=d&_docanchor=&_ct=24&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=fb57fe5e84a086c6b1fa65abea55dbd8 Genetically Engineered and Modified Live Virus Vaccines;Public Health and Animal Welfare Concerns by Michael W. Fox BVetMed,PhD,DSc.MRCVS http://www.twobitdog.com/drfox/specialreport_Article.aspx?ID=273f53f4-bcdc-474f-a189-cca1d1a81c38 Vaccination: An Overview Dr. Melissa Kennedy, DVM360 http://veterinarycalendar.dvm360.com/avhc/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=568351 World Small Animal Veterinay Association's 2010 Guidelines for the Vaccination of Dogs and Cats http://www.wsava.org/VGG1.htm (scroll down to Vaccine Guidelines 2010 http://www.wsava.org/PDF/Misc/VaccinationGuidelines2010.pdf World Small Animal Veterinary Association 2007 Vaccine Guidelines http://www.wsava.org/SAC.htm Scroll down to Vaccine Guidelines 2007 (PDF) The 2003 American Animal Hospital Association's Canine Vaccine Guidelines are accessible online at http://www.leerburg.com/special_report.htm . The 2006 American Animal Hospital Association's Canine Vaccine Guidelines are downloadable in PDF format at http://www.aahanet.org/PublicDocuments/VaccineGuidelines06Revised.pdf 2011 American Animal Hospital Association's Canine Vaccine Guidelines https://www.aahanet.org/PublicDocuments/CanineVaccineGuidelines.pdf Veterinarian, Dr. Robert Rogers,has an excellent presentation on veterinary vaccines at http://www.newvaccinationprotocols.com/ October 1, 2002 DVM Newsletter article entitled, AVMA, AAHA to Release Vaccine Positions, http://www.dvmnewsmagazine.com/dvm/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=35171 July 1, 2003 DVM Newsletter article entitled, What Do We Tell Our Clients?, Developing thorough plan to educate staff on changing vaccine protocols essential for maintaining solid relationships with clients and ensuring quality care http://www.dvmnewsmagazine.com/dvm/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=61696 July 1, 2003, DVM Newsletter article, Developing Common Sense Strategies for Fiscal Responsibility: Using an interactive template to plan service protocol changes http://www.dvmnewsmagazine.com/dvm/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=61694 Animal Wellness Magazine Article Vol. 8 Issue 6, How Often Does he REALLY Need A Rabies Shot Animal Wellness Magazine - devoted to natural health in animals The Rabies Challenge Animal Wise Radio Interview Listen to Animal Wise (scroll down to The Rabies Challenge 12/9/07) The Vaccine Challenge Animal Talk Naturally Online Radio Show ? The Vaccine Challenge - Show #91 Rabies Prevention – United States, 1991 Recommendations of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee (ACIP), Center for Disease Control's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly March 22, 1991 / 40(RR03);1-19 http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00041987.htm "A fully vaccinated dog or cat is unlikely to become infected with rabies, although rare cases have been reported (48). In a nationwide study of rabies among dogs and cats in 1988, only one dog and two cats that were vaccinated contracted rabies (49). All three of these animals had received only single doses of vaccine; no documented vaccine failures occurred among dogs or cats that had received two vaccinations. "
  • nobarkusN

    Pet health insurance

    Basenji Health Issues & Questions
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    imbjI
    I'd check those with high customer ratings.
  • Kris_ChristineK

    Delaware sb 147 action alert

    Basenji Health Issues & Questions
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    Kris_ChristineK
    Rabies 'over-vaccination' targeted in Delaware by Marc Selinger, The Examiner 7/2/12 http://www.examiner.com/article/rabies-over-vaccination-targeted-delaware "Sen. Karen Peterson, the measure’s main sponsor. “It is needed because some veterinarians tell their clients that rabies shots must be administered annually when, in fact, they are using three-year vaccines. This practice can and has resulted in the deaths of dogs who were over-vaccinated.”
  • S

    FREE Pet Safety Pack From The ASPCA

    Basenji Health Issues & Questions
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    P
    Shelley - I'll be your first customer when you develop the safety pack!! Joking apart, I've not seen RSPCA advertising this.
  • F

    5 toes

    Basenji Health Issues & Questions
    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    6k Views
    S
    When will we be able to see a photo?