Skip to content
Basenji Forums
  1. Home
  2. Breeder Talk
  3. Same dog in pedigree

Same dog in pedigree

Breeder Talk

Suggested Topics

  • tanzaT

    Zande's pedigree site, it is important

    Breeder Talk
    6
    9 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    ZandeZ
    @chenke yes of course you can ! It is the work of a few seconds to change a photo once the program knows it needs to look for one.
  • youngandtiredY

    Great Book for dog lovers

    Breeder Talk
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    sabaS
    Thought so :)…
  • gbroxonG

    AKC Registration for Dogs from "Other" Domestic Registries

    Breeder Talk
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    tanzaT
    @gbroxon: It sounds like reputable breeders don't have to worry about this, Pat? As a reputable breeder will register the litter, and that would be caught(?) if a disreputable buyer tried to circumvent limited registration by going this route? This would help people that purchase a dog that "was" AKC but they (BYB's or Puppymillers) don't want to do the DNA AKC requirement or pay to register the litter. However, it bring up another point… just because a breeder "says" here is the pedigree, doesn't mean it really belongs to that dog. Of course that is one of the reasons that AKC started the required frequent sire requirement of DNA on file. And the reason that many BYB's and Puppymills then started their own "registries" If AKC were to say, OK you can register, but must be spay/neuters as it is with their PAL/ILP program (conditional registration) I would not have objections. I know of dogs registered and there is no way that the pedigee of that dog represents the sire and dam.
  • cuttiepie732C

    Pedigree

    Locked Breeder Talk
    103
    0 Votes
    103 Posts
    54k Views
    AlexA
    Closing thread.
  • NemoN

    Breeding Using Younger Dogs

    Breeder Talk
    32
    0 Votes
    32 Posts
    8k Views
    khanisK
    I completely agree with Pat on this one. I know that Pam/Sheila [Eldorado] used our Rocket Man last year. They bred him to a clear bitch, and were really hoping for more than the 1 clear that they got… Sean [RWD at the national] was their clear pup. So, they pre-limmed Sean this year and used him on two bitches; for one, it was her last litter and a way for them to continue forward with these bloodlines and producing all clear puppies. I see absolutely NOTHING wrong with this…. they did the health testing... the dam herself is older and Sean's sire turned 14 last month. The pedigree is laden with health-testing WITH GOOD RESULTS. It is completely different than the PP mentioning using a young male that wasn't pre-limmed, and although the sire is I think she said 12, has produced enough HD to make using this dog WITHOUT pre-lim testing quite risky. Sure, it can be done, but why make it so there could be potential problems in unborn pups? It's better to give them the best possible start in life that you can. And, since a pup over six months old can be pre-limmed, there is ABSOLUTELY NO EXCUSES for not having it done!!! I also agree that you do not trust someone saying "my vet looked at them and they are fine" Sorry, if you are willing to put the $150-300 into the health-testing you are just not going to balk at the miniscule $35 to have an OFA certification number for your results!
  • nobarkusN

    I'm show dog illiterate

    Breeder Talk
    20
    0 Votes
    20 Posts
    9k Views
    QuercusQ
    I can just see them in the ring…thinking 'fine don't give me that liver right now...I know if a few hours, you will take that jacket off, and lay it on the bed, and when you go to the bathroom, I will just get it then' envisioning them rubbing their little digits together in a tent like fashion....patience, patience....