Skip to content

Rumours

Breeder Talk
  • I stumbled upon this article..

    _Well, colour me surprised but I think I?m about to heap more praise on the Kennel Club than I?ve ever heaped before.

    Before I go on, I must first caution - I am dealing in pure rumour and speculation. But the source is usually good.

    There could be a huge announcement at Crufts that the Kennel Club is preparing to open the studbook and (finally) encourage crossbreeding to widen the gene pools of pedigree dog breeds.

    Could it be that there is finally some hope for many inbred breeds and that the ridiculous, snobbish attitude to ?purity? is about to be blown away for good?

    This move to open the studbook (allow breeds to be outcrossed with other breeds) is something that welfare campaigners have been asking for for many years and one that scientists have stated is what is needed to help get dogs out of the genetic bottleneck that many find themselves in.

    Of course, such a move would be a monumental change in pedigree dogdom and would no doubt create some explosive debate within the dog world. But it is unquestionably the right move and would instantly mark Crufts 2009 out as the event that began to set dogs on a fast track to recovery.

    Let?s hope that this is one Crufts rumour that actually comes true. But, I must again reiterate, it?s a rumour. Still, we can but wish for it to be confirmed!

    Update: Further to the earlier rumour, more fuel to the fire, it is now rumoured that in an effort to halt the genetic decline, the KC is going to INSIST on outcrossing in any breeds with high average COIs (coefficient of inbreeding). So that would include all the endangered breeds such as Dandie Dinmonts, Sealyham and Cesky Terriers. What a truly fantastic response from the KC (if true!)._

    http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/2028/unconfirmed-crufts-rumour-big-news-announcement-re-crossbreeding/

Suggested Topics

  • recent thoughts on tight line breeding?

    Breeder Talk
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    33k Views
    H
    @senjisilly just now saw your reply. Thanks for the pedigree website. I knew about it and it’s a great resource.
  • Yodeldog Kennel

    Breeder Talk
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    8k Views
    RouxR
    @tanza I don't believe there was a limit to the number of letters, though I wasn't paying much attention to whether the field stopped me from continuing. Tanza is nice! I was actually surprised no one has claimed the name :D
  • solving the "bad breeder" problem:

    Breeder Talk
    34
    0 Votes
    34 Posts
    12k Views
    elbrantE
    @tanza said in solving the "bad breeder" problem:: you know nothing about breeding ... In all fairness, @tanza, you don't have any idea where my breadth of knowledge lies. I have previously stated that I have no desire to become a breeder, but that isn't the point. Is it? You are venting because I am firmly standing my ground. We've been through this discussion before and I'd wager that we will do it again. Over the same thing, ad nauseam. either allow this or ... I understand that you are frustrated. @eeeefarm said in solving the "bad breeder" problem:: It is also fair to state any provable fact, but that should be left up to the individual, e.g. "my puppy has "such & such" condition, and my puppy came from "so & so" breeder with this existing condition. I agree with this, provided there is a way to prove that the illness could have been prevented by the breeder. That doesn't mean that every illness is breeder related. For example: Parvo and Giardia are widespread issues commonly contracted from one infected animal coming into contact with another, before or after the pup leaves the breeder. A pup with Giardia isn't necessarily a result of poor care by the breeder because it would be almost impossible to determine where the pup was infected. I think we should avoid referring to a breeder using subjective terms like: bad, irresponsible, etc. You cannot prove an opinion. If someone sees a statement (like that) about them and decides to contact an attorney, you and I aren't the ones who would be going to court. @JENGOSMonkey Thank you for your two cents (I liked the image, too). You are right. Most of what I do as a "moderator" is banning people who create profiles for commercial websites to improve their Google rank. I feel like if I kick them off right away, they won't bother us with inappropriate posts. I have banned over 2,000 profiles (so far), looks like I have 3 or 4 more to tend to today.
  • Misty mountains in Knoxville TN

    Breeder Talk
    34
    0 Votes
    34 Posts
    12k Views
    tanzaT
    @zande - So true Zande, the test is 65.00 and considering the heartbreak and cost of caring for a Fanconi Basenji (try shoving down 20+ pills a day) it is something that anyone breeding, even Back Yard Breeders or Puppymills should always do... Also if someone happens to get a puppy or is unsure about the breeder they did get a Basenji puppy from, spend the 65.00 and have the DNA Fanconi test done... again it is a cheek swab that you order from OFA.org
  • 0 Votes
    16 Posts
    12k Views
    E
    @zande thank you so much for your help
  • Harmony Hounds in Brunswick , Georgia

    Moved Breeder Talk
    24
    0 Votes
    24 Posts
    17k Views
    elbrantE
    @lindenbaum I've long forgotten about this thread. If I am remembering correctly, I left it up so that people could read the flags that it may be a puppy mill and be able to make their own decision regarding that. I am deliberately wording that as "... may be... " because I do not have any personal interaction with "HH" and therefore cannot speak to it. (please note that I removed your "HH available breeds" list, no offense)